Back To Top

Good Agreements With Experiments

Good Agreements With Experiments

Over a two-year period, data was collected for personal laboratory experiments with students in negotiation and management courses at the Technical University of Vienna and the University of Vienna. A total of 292 students participated in 146 negotiation experiences. Students were randomly assigned to dyads and roles. 36% of participants were women and the average age of participants was 25.1 years. Students were given courses for their participation regardless of the outcome of the negotiation experience. For the study, compensation based on participation, not performance, was selected because preliminary tests indicated a strong intrinsic motivation of participants to perform well and, since it would be inappropriate to base compensation on the performance of randomly awarded salaries, as negotiated procedures were expected to have a positive and negative influence on the outcome of negotiations in these treatments. 18 Dyades were excluded from the full registration of the negotiations due to the lack of responses to the questionnaire and 18 other Dyades for violating the veto procedure described above. The Dyades, who deviated from the test instructions in the negotiations through a veto process, accepted it prematurely after several vetoes on a solution, before all possible solutions were vetoed, and only one was retained as a possible result. Table 4 shows the remaining observations in the four experimental treatments, and differences in treatment size emerge, in addition to exclusions of different course sizes.

Barrett S (1994) Self-imposed international environmental agreements. Oxf Econ Pap 46 (1): 878-894 “Demand for our railways continues to grow and we need to work smarter with our rail industry partners if we are to continue the improvements we have made over the past decade in services. Maintaining a high level of performance in a constantly overburdened network, while investing billions of pounds and reducing costs, is a great challenge for all of us, a challenge that alliances will meet. How complex could it be for a city council that wants to electrify its roads in order to promote the use of electric cars, prepare a tender with all possible aspects of the projects so that a contractor can give a fixed price? What about the assessment of all possible risks (right, property, technology, etc.), including problems when they choose the wrong solution? And time to do so with continuous improvements and changes in technology, legislation, etc.? Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1998) International Environmental Agreements: Incentives and Political Economy. Eur Econ Rev 42 (3-5): 561-572 Both consortiums transferred their teams to Australia, where they formed mixed teams with Water Corporation people and developed their solutions for six months. In November 2008, after careful consideration of both proposals, the winners were announced. They were chosen to develop their solution, while the consortium of losers was reimbursed for all costs and expenses incurred during the development of their proposal.